It's because unless you have some authoritarianism in you, you have no backbone. You might one minute find a certain intellectual discourse or idea appealing, but then someone hurts your feeling, so you find it unappealing. Hollow people follow whatever makes them feel good in the moment. After a time, they lack depth to such an extent that they can't even imagine or conceptualize real danger to themselves. They invite in dangerous people and submit to murder or to rape. They don't imagine this could have been prevented or preventable. People without a trace of authoritarianism become a danger to those around them because you can't rely on them for anything, not even your personal safety.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Perhaps even the majority of people absolutely have a reading and perception problem or just want to be something they are not. I just rec...
-
Wouldn’t a Matriarchal Society Be Great? | Clarissa's Blog It's very bizarre essentialism. The 19th Century European notion -- or ...
It's funny, because in Jewish theology it's very much the opposite: there's a notion of (and I don't know the Hebrew terminology so I apologize) the "degeneration of the generations" whereby the latter generations are said to be far lacking in wisdom and spirituality than the previous, and that everything becomes progressively worse until the messianic era arrives (this could have very well been what Walter Benjamin was channeling in the critique of progress in his Theses on History, which was apparently an influenced on Adorno and Horkheimer's critique of progress in DoE).
And honestly, I'm at the point where elitism (as it is today) appeals to me, even as an anarchist. I would not like to "sink to the level of the masses" through some kind of populist endeavor if that entails swimming in their shit.