One needs to see free will from a philosophical materialist's point of view (including economics, political structures, endocrine systems and so on) rather than seeing it from the philosophical moralist's point of view. The moralist is only interested in dispensing blame.
Nothing in the materialist's viewpoint is absolute, but everything is relative and dialectical. That is why there is no point in saying something like "free will either does or does not pertain".
Monday 14 March 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Perhaps even the majority of people absolutely have a reading and perception problem or just want to be something they are not. I just rec...
-
Wouldn’t a Matriarchal Society Be Great? | Clarissa's Blog It's very bizarre essentialism. The 19th Century European notion -- or ...
-
It's very important to find the central points from which ideas are being disseminated, if one wants to have a chance to change the dire...
No comments:
Post a Comment