This pertains to the whole BS of demanding sensitivity and making sensitivity out to have a political meaning. The naive assumption is that the more sensitive we can become, the better for all involved, but I am of the opposite opinion, that if we have a clear and overarching social order (something akin to absolutism) we can avoid the worst traits of human infantile regression into paranoia, fear and blame. I’m very much not of the view that having any sort of power or respect for one’s own values is negative. To be even clearer, I see patriarchal authority as being predicated, more often than not, on an extreme form of infantilism — the fear of women. The agenda of heightening sensitivity is in exact opposition to any feminist outcome.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Perhaps even the majority of people absolutely have a reading and perception problem or just want to be something they are not. I just rec...
-
Wouldn’t a Matriarchal Society Be Great? | Clarissa's Blog It's very bizarre essentialism. The 19th Century European notion -- or ...
-
It's very important to find the central points from which ideas are being disseminated, if one wants to have a chance to change the dire...
No comments:
Post a Comment